Steve Lefemine, SC State House, Columbia, SC, January 12, 2011, Inauguration of Governor Nikki Haley (R)Search
Audio of 2005 Committee Hearings
How You Can Help
Links
Recent Posts
- REPENTANCE FOR AMERICA’S BLOODGUILT OUTDOOR WORSHIP SERVICE – Exodus 20:13
- REPENTANCE FOR AMERICA’S BLOODGUILT OUTDOOR WORSHIP SERVICE – Psalm 51 (KJV)
- REPENTANCE FOR AMERICA’S BLOODGUILT OUTDOOR WORSHIP SERVICE – PSA
- SUPPORT FEDERAL and STATE “PERSONHOOD” LEGISLATION TO END "ABORTION”
- 2010 Colorado Personhood Amendment does not pass; percentage increases slightly from 2008
Archives
- January 2011 (4)
- November 2010 (1)
- October 2010 (2)
- August 2010 (1)
- July 2010 (3)
- June 2010 (9)
- May 2010 (7)
- April 2010 (9)
- March 2010 (13)
- February 2010 (12)
- January 2010 (4)
- December 2009 (5)
- November 2009 (1)
- October 2009 (3)
- September 2009 (3)
- May 2009 (4)
- April 2009 (1)
- March 2009 (3)
- February 2009 (10)
- January 2009 (4)
- December 2008 (2)
- October 2008 (2)
- July 2008 (1)
- June 2008 (3)
- May 2008 (4)
- April 2008 (2)
- February 2008 (5)
- December 2007 (2)
- July 2007 (1)
- June 2007 (1)
- May 2007 (2)
- April 2007 (1)
- March 2007 (5)
- February 2007 (2)
- January 2007 (5)
- December 2006 (3)
- August 2006 (1)
- July 2006 (4)
- June 2006 (4)
- May 2006 (9)
- April 2006 (4)
- March 2006 (2)
- February 2006 (3)
- January 2006 (1)
- December 2005 (1)
- June 2005 (3)
- May 2005 (7)
- April 2005 (6)
- March 2005 (7)
- February 2005 (2)
Remarks by Senator McConnell – SC Senate Journal, April 13, 2010
Remarks by Senator Glenn McConnell (R-Charleston) made in opposition to the Recall of S.450 (SC Personhood Bill)
[ After linking to the entire Senate Journal for April 13, 2010, then conduct search for: Remarks by Senator McConnell ]
Senator McConnell’s remarks include: 1) Repeatedly and erroneously calling the bill “unconstitutional”
2) Expressing his opposition to requiring the State of SC to defend in court, at taxpayers’ expense, the right to life of unborn children as “persons”, should this bill become law and likely be challenged in court
3) Asserting his support for allowing the execution of unborn children in the womb if their circumstances of conception include rape, incest, or the so-called health or so-called life of the mother
4) Expressing his opposition to charging “doctors” who murder human beings in the womb with manslaughter or murder
